Koda

Welcome to Koda bug tracker!

At the moment you can post bugreports or suggestions anonymously. But registered users have some benefits: attaching files, commenting, voting, tracking tasks e.t.c.

Due some asshole started spamming tracker, now (at least for some time) it’s not allowed to create anonymous tasks. Sorry for unconvenience.

In edit fields you can use DokuWiki syntax for formatting.

Tasklist

FS#273 - Edit styles: some suggested changes

Attached to Project: Koda
Opened by Chris Haslam (c.haslam) - Thursday, 19 May 2011, 01:12 GMT+3
Type Bug Report
Category Application
Status Unconfirmed
Assigned To No-one
Operating System All
Severity Low
Priority Normal
Reported Version Development
Due in Version Undecided
Due Date Undecided
Percent Complete 0%
Votes 0
Private No

Details

I think that ES_MULTILINE should not appear in Object Inspector because an EditBox is by definition multi-line.

In C/C++, WS_GROUP is the way of marking a control as the first in a group, and another control as the last in the group. But AutoIt uses, and Koda generates, a pair of calls to GUICtrlCreateGroup. So I suggest removing WS_GROUP from TAEdit in Object Inspector. The fewer styles there are, the easier it is for a user: some scrolling down is inevitable, but the less he needs to do so the less likely he is to miss a style that he needs to check or uncheck.

Koda shows WS_VISIBLE as forced, but AutoIt doesn’t. Further, WS_VISIBLE remains checked even when Visible is False. I suggest removing WS_VISIBLE.

I think that WS_CHILD only applies to Forms. So I suggest removing it from Object Inspector | TAEdit.

This task depends upon

Comment by Admin (Lazycat) - Thursday, 09 June 2011, 15:35 GMT+3
I think that ES_MULTILINE should not appear in Object Inspector because an EditBox is by definition multi-line.

I will consider.

In C/C++, WS_GROUP is the way of marking a control as the first in a group, and another control as the last in the group. But AutoIt uses, and Koda generates, a pair of calls to GUICtrlCreateGroup. So I suggest removing WS_GROUP from TAEdit in Object Inspector. The fewer styles there are, the easier it is for a user: some scrolling down is inevitable, but the less he needs to do so the less likely he is to miss a style that he needs to check or uncheck.

Sounds reasonable. I'll think, maybe remove styles that not changing in any way. Or make them optional.

Loading...